Update

Home Up

 

                    Tennessee School Improvement Plan

                                         Updates

                                         2006-07

                            Warren County Schools

                     Director of Schools, Dr. Jerry Hale

 

                                       

 

                        Hickory Creek Elementary School

                                    270 Pioneer Lane

                                McMinnville, TN 37110

                            Principal, Mr. Donald Prater

 

                                            Table of Contents

                                            Up-dates – 2006-07

Component 1: School Profile and Collaborative Progress

1.1: Leadership Team Composition p. 1

1.2: Subcommittees Formation and Operation p. 2-7

1.3: Parents, School, Community, and Students

Up-dates p. 8-12

Component 2: Beliefs, Mission, and Vision – up-dates

2.1: Collaborative Process p. 13

2. 2/3: Beliefs p. 13

2.4: Mission p. 14

2.5: Vision p. 14

Component 3: Academic and Non-Academic Data Analysis

3.1-3: Attendance and Promotion p. 15

3.2: Strengths and Needs - TCAP p. 15-17

3.2: Data Collection and Analysis p.15-21 3.3 Disaggregated Data p. 17

3.3: Growth Difference among High, Middle, and Low Achievers – 2006 p. 18

3.3: ThinkLink Testing and Dibels p. 19

3.4: Narrative Synthesis of All Data p. 21

3.5: Prioritized List of Goal Targets p. 22

Component 4: Curricular, Instructional, Assessment and Organizational Effectiveness

4.1: Collaboration p. 23

4.2: Evaluation of the Decision-making Process p. 23

4.3: The Connection of Resource Usage to the School Improvement Plan p. 24

4.4: Curriculum Analysis and Support up-date p.24-26 Alignment with Feeder Schools p. 27

Component 5: Action Plan Development p. 28-37

5.1: Goals p. 28-37

5.2: Action Steps p. 28-37

5.3: Implementation Plan p. 28-37

Component 6: The School Improvement Plan and Process Evaluatio

6.1: Formative Assessment p. 41

6.2 Summative Assessment p. 42

Hickory Creek School – School Improvement Plan – Update May 2007

FORM 1.1: SIP Leadership Team Composition

SIP Leadership Team Member Name

Leader-

ship Chair? (Y/N)

Position

Name of Subcommittee(s) (when applicable)

Donald Prater (Y) Principal
Kay Brownyard (Y) School Counselor Chair
Vickie Dodd (Y) Curriculum Coordinator Co-Chair & Component 3
Teresa Lance (Y) First Grade Teacher Component 1
Jackie Smith (Y) Third Grade Teacher Component 2
Teresa Payne (Y) Resource Teacher Component 2
Karen Adcock (Y) Teacher – Reading Coach Component 4
Shirley Haley (Y) Teacher – Reading Coach Component 4
Sherry Graves (Y) Fifth Grade Teacher Component 5
Sherry Hale (Y) Second Grade Teacher Component 6
Teela Mason (Y) Third Grade Teacher Component 6
April Walls (N) ESL Teacher Component 1
Brent Foster (N) Parent/First Nat. Bank V.P. Partner in Education Rep.
Bobby Cox (N) Supervisor of Instruction Central Office Rep.
Beverly Melton (N) Teacher Assistant Component 5
Courtney Breedlove (N) PTO Officer Parent
Jack Phillips (N) President/Yorozu Parent & Partner in Ed.

 

The Leadership Team (Component Chairs) convened on Jan. 18, 2006, and formed sub-committees to draft the SIP for Hickory Creek School. On Jan. 24, 2006, the Leadership Team (three by phone or email) met to collaborate on the SIP timelines and to update members regarding the new guidelines. The information submitted by the chairs was reviewed and a consensus for approval was given by the Leadership Team on April 17, 2006. On April 28, 2006, after advisement from the Central Office Representative, Bobby Cox, goals 1 and 2 (academic goals) were restructured to reflect the new proficiency targets.

The Leadership Team was revised on Sept. 14, 2006, to add Beverly Melton a teacher assistant. Other revisions were made for the 2006-07 school year.

Component 1 - School Profile and Collaborative Process

FORM 1.2: Subcommittee Formation and Operation

(Rubric 1.2)

Subcommittee for Component 1 School Profile3 and Collaborative Process

Member Name Position

Chair

Teresa Lance First Grade Teacher

(Y)

Lydia Taylor First Grade Teacher  
Shannon Jacobs Special Education Teacher  
April Walls ESL Teacher  
Brent Estes Fourth Grade Teacher  
Phyllis Snider Kindergarten Teacher  
Andrea Tinsley Second Grade Teacher  
Leslie Hoover School Nurse  
Ruth Ann Webb Attendance Clerk  
Charlotte Underhill School Secretary  
Angel Warden Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Louise Green Teacher Assistant  
Patsy McMahan Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Amy Seber Art Teacher  
Isabell Garibaldi ESL Teacher Assistant  
Katherine Nunez Parent  

 

Component 1 Subcommittee has met and minutes are on file.  X YES     _ NO

 

 ____(Signature on file)_____________________________

Subcommittee 1 Chair Signature

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subcommittee for Component 2 Beliefs, Mission and Vision

Member Name

Position

Chair

Teresa Payne Special Education Teacher

(Y)

Jackie Smith Third Grade Teacher

(Y)

Gail Flanders Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Claudia Caldwell Special Education Teacher  
Emily George Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Vickie Northcutt Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Carol Neal Gifted Teacher/Coordinator  
Penny Stacy Kindergarten Teacher  
Erica Todd Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Cynthia Duncan Kindergarten Teacher  
Delores Green First Grade Teacher  
Angie Mullican Physical Education Teacher  
Candice Willmore Behavior Intervention Teacher  
Sandee Weitzel Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Lanita Boyd Fourth Grade Teacher  
Allison Brewer Parent  

        Component 2 Subcommittee has meet and minutes are on file    _X_ YES   ___ NO

         __(Signature on file)___________________________________________

        Subcommittee 2 Chair Signature

 

 

 

Subcommittee for Component 3 Academic and Non-Academic Data Analysis

Member Name

Position

Chair

Vickie Dodd Curriculum Coordinator

(Y)

Terri Myers Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Christy Hickerson Special Education Teacher  
Yuliana Chavez Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Linda Ray Second Grade Teacher  
Janice Breedlove Teacher Assistant  
Diane Starkey Kindergarten Teacher  
Gail Freeman Second Grade Teacher  

Jeanette Rogers

Kindergarten Teacher  
Charlotte Boyd Third Grade Teacher  
Fannie Williams Third Grade Teacher  
Theresia Rogers Parent  

        Component 3 Subcommittee has met and minutes are on file _X_ YES   ___ NO

            __(Signature on file)___________________________________________

            Subcommittee 3 chair Signature

 

 

 

Subcommittee for COMPONENT 4 Curricular, Instructional, Assessment, and Organizational Effectiveness 

Member Name

Position

Chair

Karen Adcock Reading Coach Teacher (Y)
Shirley Haley Reading Coach Teacher (Y)
Senia Mullican Speech Therapist
Marianne Elliott First Grade Teacher
Angie Sherrill Kindergarten Teacher
Katie Stewart Music Teacher
Sue Clark Reading Teacher K, 1, & 2
Nancy Golden Parent
Tatum Prater Director Computer Lab.
Lisa Miller Fifth Grade Teacher
Component 4 Subcommittee has met and minutes are on file. X YES __ NO
(Signatures on file)
Subcommittee 4 Chair Signature

 

 

 

 

 

Subcommittee for COMPONENT 5 Action Plan Development

Member Name

Position

Chair

Sherry Graves Fifth Grade Teacher

(Y)

Patty Cantrell Librarian  
Tatum Prater Computer Lab Director  
Nancy Wallace Fifth Grade Teacher  
Deanna Smith Fourth Grade Teacher  
Mandy Blankenship Third Grade Teacher  
Jana Patterson Third Grade Teacher  
Jayme Jaco Second Grade Teacher  
Cindy Hunt Second Grade Teacher  
Ann Roberts Special Education Teacher  
Brenda Lee Bookkeeper  
Susan Phillips Library Assistant  
Beverly Melton Teacher Assistant  
Lois Pelham Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Ramona Cooper Cafeteria Manager  
Lynette McKinley Parent  
Donald Prater Principal  

 

Component 5 Subcommittee has met and minutes are on file.

X YES __ NO

(Signature on file)

Subcommittee 5 Chair Signature

 

 

Subcommittee for Component 6 The School Improvement Plan and Process Evaluation

Member Name Position

Chair

Sherry Hale Second Grade Teacher

(Y)

Teela MAson Third Grade Teacher

(Y)

Melissa Reep Fourth Grade Teacher  
Roxanne Crain Fourth Grade Teacher  
Kim Woods Physical Education Teacher  
Carolyn Leonetti Fifth Grade Teacher  
Lisa Mason Third Grade teacher  
Janice Boyd Special Education Teacher  
Keri Wood Special Education Teacher Assistant  
Keri Anderson Parent  
Donald Prater Principal  

        Component 6 Subcommittee has met and minutes are on file.  _X_ YES   ___ NO

            __(Signatures on file)______________________________________________

            Subcommittee 6 Chair Signature

 

 

 

Up-date for SIP 2006-07

Hickory Creek School

Component 1

1.3 Parents and Community Up-dates

Parents at Hickory Creek School are involved in the library, classrooms, and numerous student activities. They volunteer to help with book fairs, field days, Hawk Walks, fund raisers, reading programs, homework, signed the Student/Parent/School Compact, proctoring for TCAP, going on field trips, and serving as room mothers for classroom parties. Parents have provided Teacher Appreciation Activities on special occasions, such as Teacher Education Week. Parents attend assemblies, PTO meetings, parent/teacher conferences, IEP meetings, and Family Reading Night. A

Grandparents Day is sponsored by the School, which draws many grandparents to the School to eat lunch with their grandchildren. Parents participate in work day to improve the school grounds, including the playground and the Nature Trail. A School Health Grant of $10,000 was awarded to the school by the CDC, Cargill Foundation, and the American School Health Association. Parents provided matching funds of about $11,000 to provide new playground equipment. Parents help with benevolent projects, working with the School to help others (such as "Share a Christmas Dinner", collecting for Katrina victims, and the Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital). Parents are important members of our School Family. Parental support is vital.

The School’s parents offer diversity with several economic, religious, social, cultural, and ethnic groups. The ethnic make up of Hickory Creek School includes White, Hispanic, African-American, Asian, and American Indian. Our school has 49.74% students on free/reduced lunches. That number has grown as several industries have closed or moved with more and more parents losing jobs or relocating. The top employers are Bridgestone/Firestone, Yoroza Corporation, and Cumberland Lumber. The local nursery industry employs many workers, but that number is difficult to count because of so much seasonal work. Many of the School’s parents speak only Spanish. Therefore, a Spanish Interpreter is on site to meet with parents and teachers. Letters, news events, and forms for Spanish speaking parents are interpreted. Parents volunteer to share their careers, cultures, and hobbies with students. A special volunteer form was created to give every parent an opportunity to select the activities of most interest to them. The forms are used throughout the year to request assistance, when needed by the PTO, teachers, administration, or others involved with school activities. Each year the School Counselor leads in Career Awareness Activities. During the 2006-07 school year, special guests where employees (many of whom are parents of Hickory Creek School students) from First National Bank, Yorozu, the Child Advocacy Center, and numerous others invited by classroom teachers.

The School Improvement Plan for Hickory Creek is on-line at the school’s web-site for all parents. The Parental Involvement portion of the Plan is in Spanish and English. The school uses many opportunities to inform parents of school

activities such as newsletters, K12Planet, notes home, School web-site, and

posting of the mission, visions and beliefs in the front hall.

An active Parent/Teacher Organization and the Partners In Education Program ensures community involvement. The Yoroza Corporation became a new Partner in Education during the 2006-07 school year. First National Bank continues to be an outstanding Partner In Education for the School.

Community Partnerships 2006-07

Shoes for Needy Students

Day Spring Community Church – contacts – Tommy and Lori Davenport–473-9013

or 473-5817

School Supplies for Needy Students

Liberty Cumberland Presbyterian Church – contact – Roger or Kay Brownyard at 473-2360 or 668-5103.

Junior Auxiliary – school supplies -contact – Jayme Jaco – 668-5100

Child Lures School Program

Junior Auxiliary – each year purchases for all 4th grade parents the Parent Guide to the Child Lures School Program – contact Page Northcutt or Jayme Jaco

Eye Exams and glasses – for any child who is referred and needs an exam

or glasses- Lions Club – forms are available in the Counselors office

Wal-Mart Vision Center – Dr. Connor

Clothing Needs - Families are referred with children who need school clothing.

Patti Clark – School Resource Center

Central Church of Christ on Thursdays from 9:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m.

School Counselor – contact Kay Brownyard

FUEL – Healthy food snacks for approved students on weekend

1. Christ Community Church – Contact – Ann Roberts.

2. Cumberland Chapel Freewill Baptist Church – Contact -Lois Pelham

3. Cornerstone Baptist Church – Contact - Beverly Melton

Partners In Education

First National Bank – Presented a program this year on banking-contact Helen Martin

Yorozu Automotive of Tennessee – New Partnership – Presented 2 programs for the school on May 8, 2007, contact – Jack Phillips, President of Yorozu

Christmas Partnerships for Needy Children

Jaycees

Noon Exchange Club

Liberty Cumberland Presbyterian Church

Volunteer Teachers and Parents

Southern Standard Newspaper

1. Each year students give up snack money to help Share a Christmas

    Dinner sponsored by The Southern Standard Newspaper

2. Needy families benefit by being given food for a nice Christmas Dinner.

3. The Mini-Standard with county and school news is published

    monthly and given to all students free of charge.

Families in Crisis

Monica Knight, Child Advocate, presented Classes on Conflict Resolution to all 4th and 5th grade students and gave handouts about angry management.

Cheer Mental Health – Project BASIC Grant

Kristi Slatton presents classes to K-3 students on social skills, etc.

Kristi Slatton is our contact for Cheer Mental Health

Robert Jones, D.D.S through Fidelity Associates -

Each year a book on Character Education is given to all 3td grade students.

Child Advocacy Center – Child Abuse Awareness and Prevention

Heather Hobbal– 507-2386- Students where given Blue Ribbons on a special day, May 8th. Heather spoke to all students about child abuse awareness and the functions of the Center, as well as her career.

 

Non-certified Staff Characteristics

Hickory Creek School’s non-certified staff members serve important roles in the life of the School. A recent survey indicated the average employment years at Warren County Schools of non-certified staff members is 11.6 years. More than 99% enjoy their work, while 100% feel they are performing jobs important to the School and students. One staff member is working on his GED, while all others have earned at least a high school diploma or GED. Most staff members have school age children or grandchildren with some attending Hickory Creek School. The staff is made-up of mostly females with 2 males. One is Native American, two are Hispanic and the other 15 respondents are white. When not working at school the staff members enjoy a variety of activities, spending time with family ranks highest. The salary for School Staff members was ranked as fair by 1.2% and low by the other 98.8% members. While there is a high degree of job satisfaction among the staff members with 100% feeling they are performing jobs important to the school, 98.8 % feel their compensation for job performance is low. This survey demonstrates a need to increase the salary of non-certified staff members. The System and the County Commissioners are the contacts for the pay increase.

1.3 Updated Student Demographics – 2006-07

Hickory Creek has an enrollment of 644 students.

Grade

Enrollment

Female

Male

Pre-K Sp. Ed.

7

1

6

Kindergarten

108

42

56

Grade 1

95

43

52

Grade 2

108

58

50

Grade 3

104

58

46

Grade 4

99

52

47

Grade 5

104

44

60

CDC

19

8

11

The School’s enrollment contains approximately the same number of male and female students. The grade level groups are close to being balanced. The System has applied for a regular pre-school program for the School for the next school year. The School is hopeful the pre-school will help increase student achievement in all areas.

 

Hickory Creek School serves as a site for ESL students. Therefore, the student population is diverse.

Caucasian

Asian

African American

Indian

Hispanic

82%

2%

5.0%

.1%

10%

Hickory Creek Elementary has 48 ESL students enrolled.

Grade

Female

Male

Kindergarten

8

1

1st

5

4

2nd

4

9

3rd

7

2

4th

4

1

5th

0

3

Total

28

20

Many of the county’s public housing school age children attend Hickory Creek Elementary. As a result, 49.74% of our students are on free/reduced breakfast and lunch. The attendance rate for Hickory Creek Elementary School for the 2005-06 school year was 95.1%. We are optimistic that our attendance rate will be as high for the 2006-07 school year.

 

 

Component 2 – Beliefs, Mission and Vision

Form 2.1: Collaborative Process

The collaborative process we use(d) to develop these components is:
The beliefs, vision, and mission statements for Hickory Creek School were written after several meetings, discussions, and revisions. The beliefs, vision, and mission statements are available to parents on the internet and through a parent representative. On January 31, 2006, after gaining input from teachers, parents and staff, the committee met giving reports, both in writing and orally. The Committee met again on Feb. 7, 2006, and reviewed the beliefs, mission, and vision statements. The committee arrived at a consensus on the statements with representatives from each grade level and a parent representative on Feb. 7, 2006.

Revisions were made on May 2, 2007. The signature of the component’s chairperson is on file. The beliefs, mission, and vision statements have been reviewed by key representatives of stakeholders at various times during the 2006-07 school year. These statements are posted in the front hall, and on the school’s web-site. Up-dates were made during May, 2007, by consent of representatives.

Form 2.2/2.3: Beliefs

Beliefs (2.2/ 2.3

1. We believe learning is a life-long process.

2. We believe teachers, parents, and the community share the responsibility of educating students, decision-making, and the development of the policies of the school.

3. We believe a healthy, safe, stimulating, and physically comfortable environment is essential in encouraging academic learning, personal development and good citizenship.

4. We believe students learn in different ways and instructional practices should take into account differences in learning styles.

5. We believe each student is a valued individual with unique physical, social, emotional and intellectual needs.

6. We believe a student’s self-esteem is enhanced by positive relationships and mutual respect among and between students and staff.

7. We believe curriculum and assessment practices should meet the individual needs of each child, giving all children the opportunity to learn the curriculum assigned.

8. We believe cultural diversity awareness increases each student’s ability to interact respectfully within the community.

9. We believe all students are capable of learning, achieving, and succeeding to their fullest potential.

 

Form 2.4: Mission

(Rubric 2.4)

Mission Statement (Rubric item 2.4 [clarity])
The mission of Hickory Creek School is to educate the students for excellence, in a safe and accepting environment, preparing them for successful futures.

 

Form 2.5: Vision

(Rubric 2.5)

Vision (Rubric item 2.5 [clarity])
The vision of Hickory Creek School is to provide an environment encouraging all students to reach their highest potentials academically, creatively, socially, emotionally, and physically in our multi-cultural society.

Component 3.1, 2, & 3 – Academic and Non-Academic Data Analysis

 

ATTENDANCE and PROMOTION

The 2006 (95.1%) attendance rate was up from 2005 with a rate of (94.9%). The number of students, who were truant, dropped by 48 students in 2006. The promotion rate was also up with 99.4% promoted in 2006 and 98.2% promoted in 2005.

The number of students who are tardy varies from week to week. The school newsletter reminds parents of the importance of children being on time for school. The counselor, the principal, the attendance clerk, or the teacher may speak with a child and/or parent with chronic tardiness to help find a solution to the problem. The parents are involved when needed.

 

Up-dates for TCAP 2006

Comparing Hickory Creek to the System and the State

Math and Language Arts

 

2006 Report Card Hickory Creek   2005 Report Card Hickory Creek   2006 System   2006 State  
Reading/

L Arts

Math Reading/

L Arts

Math Reading/

L Arts

Math Reading/

L Arts

Math
C / 51 B / 53 C / 50 B / 53 B / 53 B / 52 B / 53 B / 55

The 2006 Report Card shows a few changes from the 2005 Report Card. The only changes were a 1 point gain in Reading/ Language Arts and a 2 point gain in Math.

 

TVAAS Up-dates 2006

TVAAS HC

2005

HC

2006

SYSTEM

2006

Reading/LA B/1.2 A/1.9 A/2.8
       
Math B/1.0 B/1.5 A/2.1
       
Science A/1.6 A/1.2 A/1.6
       
Social Studies A/1.5 A/2.4 A/1.7

The Hickory Creek TVAAS scores for 2006 did show some changes. Reading/Language Arts gained from a B (1.2) to an A (1.9). The Math scores show a gain from B (1.0) to a B (1.5) with Social Studies gaining from 1.5 to 2.4. However, Science was the only area not making a gain. Hickory Creek remained in the A status with the gain changing from 1.6 to 1.2 in Science.

Reading/Language Arts TVAAS

  05-06   04-05   03-04   3YR AVG STATE 3YR AVG GAIN
FOURTH GRADE -5.8   2.2   -1.9   -1.9 0.7
FIFTH GRADE 5.9   8.6   3.4   5.8 2.9

Reading continues to be a trouble spot for fourth grade. TVAAS scores for 2005-06 in fourth grade shows the need to continue to make Reading a goal for improvement in all subgroups.

MATH TVAAS

  05-06   04-05   03-04   3YR AVG STATE 3YR AVG GAIN
FOURTH GRADE -3.8   -1.2   -3.2   -2.6 1.1
                 
FIFTH GRADE 7.4   9.5   -0.3   5.5 2.4

Math dropped again in both grades. Significant drops were seen in fourth grade and a slight drop in fifth grade. This also shows that Math must continue to be an improvement goal for Hickory Creek.

 

SCIENCE TVAAS

  05-06   04-05   03-04   3YR AVG STATE 3YR GAIN
FOURTH GRADE -0.9   5.2   -2.6   0.5 2.4
                 
FIFTH GRADE 0.2   5.6   0.1   2.0 0.9

Science shows a significant drop in fourth and fifth grade.

Although the grade is an (A) overall, this area shows a need to focus attention to improve in order stop the decline in achievement.

 

SOCIAL STUDIES TVAAS

  05-06   04-05   03-04   3YR AVG STATE 3YR GAIN
FOURTH GRADE 3.5   1.3   -0.4   1.6 2.3
                 
FIFTH GRADE 1.7   4.3   4.2   3.3 2.1

 

Hickory Creek fourth grade gained in Social Studies, while the fifth grade dropped from a 4.3 to a 1.7. Overall, Social Studies still remained an A on the Report Card.

 

Disaggregationed Data 3.3

The 2006 subgroup reporting for Hickory Creek was in two categories: Economically Disadvantaged and Students with Disabilities. The Economically Disadvantaged subgroup scored 70% proficient or advanced and 30% below proficient in Reading/Language. In Math 69% of students scored proficient or advanced, while 31% scored below proficient. The Students with Disabilities subgroup scored 58% proficient or advanced and 42% below proficient in Reading/Language. In Math 58% of students scored proficient or advanced and 42% below proficient. Both subgroups need to improve to meet our Reading and Math goals.

The group of All Students posted an 82% proficient or advanced in Reading/Language and an 82% proficient or advanced in Math. Hickory Creek was 1% away from meeting the Reading/Language goal. The Math goal was met for all students. However, sub groups need to continue to strive to meet both goals. In all groups, Hickory Creek is below the State and the System scoring. However, the school has shown enough improvement to remain in "Good Standing".

There were slight differences in male and female performances on TCAP with females usually scoring higher. Improvements are seen in the scores of students with disabilities and economically disadvantages. Math scores for students with disabilities improved from 39% (2 year average) to 47% (2 year average) for proficient or advanced. In Reading the scores for 2 year averages for the same group moved from 50% to 55% advanced or proficient. The two year average stayed the same in Reading for the economically disadvantaged group. Overall, the 2006 testing year was a good year for these two groups. The Hispanic group remained the same in Math and but was lower in Reading with a drop from 57% 2005 to 52% in 2006. Writing scores remained the same with 4.1 (A) for both years. On the CELLA test for ESL students, Hickory Creek students made AYP.

Growth Difference among High, Middle, and Low Achievers – 2006

Fourth grade reading/language arts and math showed a decline in growth in all three groups in the academic areas of Read/Language Arts and Math.

The fifth grade demonstrated gains in all groups (high, middle, and low).

Fourth Grade

The highest decline was in the area of reading/language arts with -4.3 in the advanced group of achievers. Fourth grade math showed declines, as well, with the greatest decline among the advanced group with a -2.9 decline. The fourth grade students need to work more on the curriculum standards in each group. Alignment of the new Reading Textbooks is an important need. The School agrees part of the decline in test scores have to do with test administration. Fourth grade is the first year students must bubble their answers on a separate answer document. Therefore, many students might have trouble staying on the correct number to mark their answers. In the next school year greater attention to standards, as well as, more practice with separate answer documents is needed. There are more students per teacher in fourth grade than any other grade, which could account for some drop in scores.

Fifth Grade

Fifth grade showed great improvements in all groups. In Math the highest gain was in the proficient group with a 6.0 gain. The advanced group gained 3.1. In fifth grade Reading/Language Arts showed the highest gains in the not proficient group with a remarkable 11.9 gain. The proficient group showed a 9.1 improvement in R/LA, with the advanced group showing a 2.0 improvement.

 

 

 

 

SIP ThinkLink Testing – Up-date

ThinkLink testing is a continuing process at Hickory Creek.
Analyzing of the test data allows the teachers to track the progress of students in their classrooms. The December test gave the following data to first through fifth grade teachers. The December results allowed each teacher to focus on the skills each student needed to reach mastery. These scores seem to be on near targets for tests administered before mid-year.

 

    % MASTERY RDG/LA   MATH SCIENCE
GRADE 1     49%   64.5%  
             
GRADE 2     64%   62%  
             
GRADE 3     49.8%   52.6% 48%
             
GRADE 4     53.75%   45% 30.5%
             
GRADE 5     47.25%   40.3% 28.8%
             

 

 

A new test was given this year to Kindergarten students called Dibels.

The Dibels Test is given individually. This test helps teachers diagnose early the strengths and weakness of each student. Individualized instruction can take place to increase each student’s achievement.

 

Parental Support and Survey

One goal in our previous plan was to increase parental support and interest in the education of their child(ren). A strong indication that parents are more involved and interested in school is the number of parent surveys returned. At the end of the 2005-06 school year only 22% of those surveyed were returned. Parents have returned 47% of the surveys in 2006-07 school year. This is an improvement of about 25%, which is a significant increase.

New Parental Programs were carried out as planned. The Parents’ surveys showed, in general, parents believe the strengths of the School are as follows;

great, qualified, and caring principal, teachers, and staff. Another strength noted is the variety of programs and resources the School offers to meet the needs of all children. Parents indicated several suggestions to improve the school. Many of these suggestions are limited by the amount of funds to carry out the programs. The greatest majority of parents agreed with the positive statements on the survey. The highest area of need with 11% disagreeing was the following statement: "Our School is safe and clean." However, 89% agreed or had no opinion to the statement: "Our School is safe and clean". In view of the recent school shootings the School understands that safety is a great concern. The School has an active safety team, uses several practice drills, such as fire drills, tornado drills, emergency drills, and checks for safety in the school and on the playgrounds. At the entrance of the School a security guard checks arriving vehicles from 7:45 a.m. until 3:00 p.m... Walkie Talkies are used by key personnel to make contact quickly. Teachers use the Walkie Talkies, when walking the nature trail with their students. A new phone and announcement system was put in place this year, which contains needed safety features. The sound system now can be heard in the halls of the school and in outside playground areas. The School Health Team is working with the System Health Services, System Maintenance Department, and the Director of Safety to correct the areas needing attention for better safety, health, and cleanliness. This team meets monthly. During the 2006-07 school year, three official school climate and safety inspections were conducted. Improvements were made each time the inspection took place.

Teacher Survey

Hickory Creek Elementary Teachers’ Survey indicates three areas of strength. The highest ratings were 89%, 83%, and 83%. The highest rating of 89% marked always for the following sentence: "Racial and ethnic fairness is demonstrated by students, teachers, and administration in our school/district." Teachers (83%) marked always in agreement to the following statements: "We are available to students for special help in academic and non-academic problems", and 83% agreed, "Our school’s facilities (workspace, furnishings, etc.) are adequate to support the instructional program." The survey indicates 14% of teachers never utilize the Curriculum Maps to drive instruction in the areas of reading/language arts, math, science, and social studies. Another look at the survey shows 77% always use stated goals for the school as the primary basis of academic achievement, while 20% sometimes use the stated goals for the school as the primary basis of academic achievement, and 3% did not respond to the statement.

To the statement, "Staff has input into the decisions affecting the school," 92% marked "always" or "sometimes", while 8% marked "never". The parents’, teachers’, and staff’s surveys work together to give the committees greater insight into the needs of the School.

 

Indicator 3.4 Narrative Synthesis of All Data

It is clear from the academic data the goals to increase the achievement of students in Reading/Language Arts and Math need to continue to be of greatest importance. All sub-groups in 4th grade need special attention.

Parental involvement will continue to be a major priority. Although parental involvement has shown great improvements, with 48% of the School’s parents responding to the surveys, the low attendance at planned events, demonstrates the need to continue to focus on parental involvement still exists.

Results of the actions and strategies used to establish a school wide Positive Behavior Program Phase I has been completed. A Positive Behavior Team was established and met to provide guidelines to be used. Evidence of the Phase I guidelines were given as evidence for Component 5. The Behavior Team has determined the Positive Behavior Plan, Phase I, has been successful but may be revised for the next school year. This conclusion was made by using informal and formal evaluations, observations, and records, which were kept by the Team’s Chairperson, Angie Mullican. Activity equipment was given to classes to be used for outside activities, as rewards for positive behavior in the halls and in the bus room. Phase II for the 2007-08 school year will a focus on cafeteria behavior, using a positive behavior plan, which will be developed by the Positive Behavior Team.

This school year a "Behavior Intervention Team" with members based at Hickory Creek School has made remarkable progress with students, who’s IEPs contain behavior issues. This Intervention Team is available throughout the day with direct coaching of appropriate behaviors, direct interventions in crisis situations, and social skills. Behavior Plans are written by the IEP team with the assistance of the classroom teacher, special education teacher, parents, and principal.

 

3.5

Prioritized List of Target Goals – Up-dates

All students will make AYP with at least 89% of the students scoring Proficient or Advanced in Reading/Language Arts on the TCAP.

All students will make AYP with at least 86% of the students scoring Proficient or Advanced in Math on the TCAP.

To increase parental involvement from the 47%, (as shown by our parent survey) to at least 60%, by continuing to give parents opportunities to become involved.

To continue making progress by moving on to Phase II of the Positive Behavior Plan, providing guidance and order to give teachers more time to teacher and helping students demonstrate better social skills, thus, helping in achieving academic gains.

 

Up-Date Component 4.1

Collaboration

The evidence documenting collaboration among and between stakeholders was submitted in previous files. Sub committee’s statements are on file of meetings and collaboration, signed by sub-committee chairs. Teachers and Staff were asked to volunteer and sign-up to be placed on committees for each component. Selected people were asked to chair the committees. These people became the Leadership Team; others were appointed or ask to serve on the Leadership Team to represent all stakeholders. All those asked to serve happily agreed to serve. Committees met and prepared the portion of the review for their assigned component. Other meetings and work days were established by the committees to work together and complete the review.

Up-Date Component 4.2

Evaluation of the Decision-making Process

The evaluation of the decision-making process is determined by the successes or weaknesses of the various programs. There are committees or teams set-up to form guidelines and to implement various programs. The committee chairs report back to the administration and team members for guidance. The strength of the process is gained from the input of the School’s various committees or teams. A few of the committees or teams are listed here; School Health Team, Positive Behavior Team, Parental Involvement Team, Accelerated Reader Committee, Summer Reading Program Committee and the PTO Executive Committee. The Principal reports findings to the full staff and faculty at the regular faculty meetings, when an open discussion might follow. The Principal puts the changes or new programming into action. Many times this method of leadership assists the school in acting in advance to deal with problems which may arise. The strength of this approach is that it is proactive. Positive benefits for students, parents, faculty, and staff are observed. Changes in programming are made when the team and the principal determine the challenges of the program out number the benefits. Of course, as with any method of leadership there are certain limitations. These limitations or needs are addressed on a one-on-one basis or as needed.

 

Up-Date Component 4.3

The Connection of Resource Usage to the School Improvement Plan

The donation to the Library of $10,000.00 and the income from the annual

Book fair of about $1,500.00 is used to up-grade the holdings of the library. These up-grades supply new books to replace old books, which are unusable. These funds are used to buy resources for teachers to use in instruction, and they provide media resources to be used in the classroom. These resources include mostly reading/language art materials. However, some resources provide Math teaching aids. The Science Kits can be selected by grade level and used in the classrooms. The library funds work together to increase achievement in reading/language arts, math, science, social studies, as well as health awareness.

State funds and local funds pay teachers to teach and to buy needed classroom supplies. All, of which, are used to meet the goals of the SIP. The PTO supplies funds to help achieve large purchases, such as, computers and up-grading technologies for integrating computer use into the curriculum, which helps to meet the School’s goals. This year the PTO matched funds for a $10,000.00 playground grant to supply playground equipment accessible to handicapped students and regular education students. Students who have a nice place to play and have enough exercise are healthier and perform better in academics, thus enabling more students to reach the SIP Goals.

4.4 Curriculum Analysis and Support Up-Date

ThinkLink testing is a continuing process at Hickory Creek.
Analyzing of the test data allows the teachers to track the progress of students in their classrooms at an earlier stage of learning. These procedures help in targeting needs and strengths of students to drive the curriculum for individual students or groups of students.

TCAP shows strengths in 4th grade Social Studies with 3.5 in TVAAS for 05-06, 5th grade Math with 7.4 in 05-06 and 5th grade Reading with 5.9 in 05-06. Areas of weakness are 4th Grade Reading/Language Arts with -5.8 in 05-06, 4th grade Math -3.8 and 4th grade Science with -0.9 in 05-06. These weaknesses seem to be a trend for Hickory Creek School. Extra supports in these areas appear to be needed.

Teachers worked during in-service days, after-school days, and planning times to correlate the State Standards with the new Math book. Teachers met by grade levels and across grade levels to check curriculum offerings for each grade. Teachers from across the County met by grade levels to map and correlate stated objectives to the State Standards. County wide Curriculum Meetings with the instructional supervisor and a representative from each school met monthly to solve problems, discuss the best usage of the System-wide testing of ThinkLink and TCAP, correlate the curriculum and textbooks with State Standards and check the usage of curriculum mapping.

New Programs 2006-07

Curriculum and Instructional Coordinator

Beginning this school year (2006-07), Hickory Creek Elementary has a Curriculum and Instructional Coordinator. This person works with the faculty and staff to help in aligning our school’s curriculum with the state standards. Our coordinator also assists teachers with classroom organization, special programs, testing questions, curriculum design, scheduling, and any other areas of need. She is available to all faculty and staff on a daily basis. The coordinator also helps to organize parental involvement activities as well as ThinkLink testing for the School.

My Reading Coach

Hickory Creek 3rd-5th graders are actively involved in a computer reading program called My Reading Coach by MindPlay.  The program uses research based teaching methods combined with cutting edge technology.  It provides a virtual reading specialist and speech pathologist for each student.  The program includes Embedded Teacher Intelligence(TM) which individualizes instruction to help each student reach grade level. My Reading Coach provides direct instruction to each student with limitless patience and encouragement.

My Reading Coach meets all critical components of scientifically established reading programs identified by the National Reading Panel:  phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.  Students are pre-tested to ensure that each student receives appropriately targeted instruction, and they are provided immediate feedback.  The program is versatile, accommodating students with diverse skills and reading needs.  The program allows easy management and tracking, providing teachers and administrators with reports on class performance, improvement statistics, and detailed information on each student's needs and problem areas.

Supplemental Reading and Math for Grades K-2

Hickory Creek Elementary offers a supplemental reading and math program for kindergarten though second grade.  Students are served on a rotating basis according to teacher recommendations.  A variety of reading and math programs and materials are used. Coordination with classroom teachers is an on going process.

  This year, in all kindergarten classes, the DIBELS program is being implemented.  The DIBELS program is based on scientific research.  It is statistically valid and a reliable indicator of reading success.  After assessing the critical areas of reading adjustments can be made in instruction to meet individual students' needs.

FUEL Program

The FUEL Program began at Hickory Creek School in January of 2007. "In the United States, recent figures show that two-million to four-million children under the age of 12 have experienced food insufficiency." Food insufficiency is one definition of hunger. Some researchers look at hunger in a much broader concept called food insecurity. Students who receive adequate nutrition learn more readily. Therefore, academics will improve. Hickory Creek School partnered with 3 local churches, to sponsor the Program by providing the bagged food each weekend for each approved student. These healthy snacks are used over the weekend by the students at their homes. The Program is managed by the School Counselor.

*Note – Information about hunger is from Childhood Hunger-The Future of Children Welfare to Work, Vol.7, number 1, by Lewit, Eugene M. and Nancy Kerrebrock.

 

LEAPS Academic Program

In January 2007, Hickory Creek Elementary began the LEAPS program. The LEAPS Program is funded by a grant through the Lottery for Education After School Programs. The Hickory Creek program is open to students who meet the criteria of ELL and/or low socio economic status. The program is funded for two teachers, one teacher assistant and 50 students. The program meets each day that school is in session for thirty minutes in the morning and from 3:00 pm until 5:30 pm in the afternoon. This is 15 hours of extra instruction weekly for the students. The students receive a free snack during the after school program each day. The program is organized to give each student an opportunity to receive mentoring, assistance with homework, tutoring, academic skills enrichment and experience in special educational programs and activities.

 

Alignment with Feeder Schools

Alignment with feeder schools is accomplished through the monthly curriculum meetings with the Director of Supervision, Bobby Cox, and one representative from each school. Those representatives take needed information back to teachers in their respective schools. Communication is further enhanced through Principals’ Meetings, and the System Newsletter (Teacher Links). Parent and teacher communication is enhanced through the use of the school’s newsletter, (Hickory Creek Happenings) the School’s website, the System web-site, and K12Planet (a web-site for teachers to post news from the classrooms, parents check their child (ren)’s attendance and grades, and school-wide news). Head-Start students and teachers are invited to the school to become familiar with the School and its teachers before students begin Kindergarten. Fifth grades students attend an orientation at Warren County Middle School. Key personnel from the Middle School visit with fifth grade students at Hickory Creek to explain the extra curricular offerings. Students are given an opportunity to enroll in these extra curricular activities before the end of 5th grade. These functions enable the students to understand what is expected of them the next year, which lessens their anxiety levels. This enables the students to feel more comfortable, when school begins in the fall. These strategies work together to enhance student achievement.

 

Up-dates 5.2

Component 5 – Action Plan Development

GOAL 1

Form 5.1: Goal 1

Goal

All students will make AYP with at least 89% of the students scoring Proficient or Advanced in Reading/Language Arts on the TCAP.

Which Need(s) does this Goal address?

To focus on and improve reading achievement scores for all subgroups in order to meet the requirements for adequate yearly progress established by the NCLB Act.

How is this Goal linked to the system’s Five-Year Plan?

Long range goal #1: By meeting AYP yearly targets

 

 

FORM 5.2: Action Steps (Goal 1)   FORM 5.3: Implementation Plan (Goal 1)
GOAL 1: Action Steps (Strategies, Interventions, or Scientific Based Research) (Rubric 5.2)  

 

Timeline

(Rubric 5.3)

Person(s) Responsible (Rubric 5.3) Projected Cost(s)

(Rubric 5.3)

Monitoring Strategy (Rubric 5.3)
Analyze reading ThinkLink test data 3 times a year in order to determine areas of mastery, partial, and non-mastery for each student. Teachers will use the data to target specific student needs. Analysis is on-going. After reports are received in Sept. ’06 Feb. ’07 and March. ‘07

Staff Development-

Aug. 9, 2006 &

Aug. 2, 6, & 7, 2007

Donald Prater, Principal,

Vickie Dodd,

All K-5 Teachers

Cost is budgeted in staff development building level days.

ThinkLink test

$9.00 per student

Teacher planning,

grade leveling planning,

after school tutoring,

summer school referrals,

Staff development built in days

ThinkLink test

$9.00 per student

Teacher planning

Grade leveling planning

After school tutoring

Summer school referrals

 

 

 

Analysis of Reading/Language Arts TCAP data is on-going determining individual needs to helps students reach mastery or above.

 

 

 

July 2006-May 2007,

Staff Development-

Aug. 9, 2006

Analysis – May-Aug, 2007 & Staff Development

Aug. 2, 3, & 4, 2007

 

 

 

Donald Prater, Principal,

Kay Brownyard

Vickie Dodd,

All Teachers

 

 

 

Cost is budgeted in staff development building level days.

TCAP cost included in System budget.

 

 

 

Teacher planning,

grade leveling planning,

after school tutoring,

summer school referrals,

Staff development built in days Teachers monitoring of classes and implementing for o
Tutoring programs before and after school will be offered to students scoring below proficient levels. Teachers will receive pre and post data to determine the degree of mastery in reading/language arts is increased September 2006-May 2007 &

Sept. 2007-May, 2008

Principal – Mr. Prater, contract teachers (TBA)

classroom teachers

Teachers using extended contract

@ approx. $15.00 per hour. Using LEAPS Tutoring @ $18.00 per hr. ATLAS Tutoring at $15.00 per hr.

Pre and Post Tests-

Classroom and extended teacher, report cards, parent communications, surveys

Alignment of teaching strategies to standards using the curriculum maps to determine that students receive the appropriate instruction to increase meeting the standards and mastery. August 2006-May 2007

Aug. 2, & 3, 2007

Continuously

Principal – Mr. Prater, teachers,

support staff,

Director of Instruction – Mr. Bobby Cox

System budget includes teachers and support staff salaries,

staff development days built in

Teacher checklist of TN State Standards
Grade level meetings will be held periodically to coordinate efforts for improvement. Thus, teachers share successes so all students can benefit, increasing proficiency. August 2006-May 2007

Monthly 2007-08

Principal – Mr. Prater, teachers,

support Staff

Teacher and support staff salary

built in System budget - $60.00 per day for substitute teachers

Teachers will meet and discuss strategies, concerns, and needs for proficiency.
Students will be required to read twenty minutes nightly or a minimum of ten minutes for K & 1 students. This reading practice will increase student achievement in reading to meet the goals. August 2006-May 2007

Aug. 2007-08

Teachers

Parents

Students

Teacher Salary

Parents-free

Students-free

Parent signature required daily verifying child read required minutes

Teacher monitoring

Technology based programs to increase student performance, along with the Orchard Program being the most utilized on a regular basis to increase students’ Reading/LA proficiency. August 2006-May 2007

Aug. 2007-08 weekly

Principal-Mr. Prater,

Classroom teachers,

Computer lab teacher-TBA

Teachers salary included in System budget Individual progress report from computer programs.
Purchase new computer program for the whole school called Study Island

Purchase SmartBoard

Aug. 2007

Aug. 2007

Principal – Mr. Prater, teachers,

Computer lab teacher

$2,700.00 Program

$1460.00 Board

Progress reports

Increase in academic achievement

 

Professional Development Plan (Steps or Strategies) to Support Action Plan (as applicable) (Rubric 5.2) Faculty and grade level meetings, required professional development days, (Principal-Donald Prater), (Director of Instruction-Bobby Cox), System-wide curriculum meetings, and workshops to improve test scores, proficiency rates, and student achievement.  
Parent and Community Member Involvement (Steps or Strategies) to Support Action Plan (as applicable) (Rubric 5.2) Teachers will discuss student progress with parents. Invitations for students to participate in tutoring programs will be sent to parents. Newsletters, pamphlets, and other literature will be sent home explaining testing criteria and interpretation. Periodic books fairs and two Family Reading Nights will encourage parents and students to read, increasing students’ proficiency rate. Student progress reports will be sent home weekly, mid-six weeks, and in report cards. Community partnerships and the School Board will be sent a copy of the School’s Newsletter,  

 

 

Goal 2 Form 5. 1 All students will make AYP with at least 86% of the students scoring Proficient or Advanced in Math on the TCAP.

Which Need(s) does this Goal address?

To focus on and improve math achievement scores for subgroups in order to meet requirements for adequate yearly progress established by the NCLB Act.

How is this Goal linked to the system’s Five-Year Plan?

Long range goal #1: By meeting AYP yearly targets

 

 

 

FORM 5.2: Action Steps (Goal 2

 

  FORM 5.3: Implementation Plan (Goal 2)
GOAL 2: Action Steps (Strategies, Interventions, or Scientific Based Research) (Rubric 5.2)  

 

Timeline

(Rubric 5.3)

Person(s) Responsible (Rubric 5.3) Projected Cost(s)

(Rubric 5.3)

Monitoring Strategy (Rubric 5.3)
Analyze Math ThinkLink test data 3 times a year in order to determine areas of mastery, partial, and non-mastery for each student. Teachers will use the data to target specific student needs.

Analysis is on-going.

 

 

After reports are received in Sept. ’07 Feb. ’08 and Jan. ‘08

Staff Development-

Aug. 9, 2006 &

Aug. 6, 2007

Aug. 2, 2007

Principal-Donald Prater,

All K-5 teachers

Vickie Dodd

Cost is budgeted in staff development building level days.

ThinkLink Test $9.00 per student

Teacher planning.

Grade leveling planning,

After school tutoring,

Summer school referrals

Technology based programs to increase student performance, along with the Orchard Program being the most utilized on a regular basis to increase students’ Math proficiency. August 2006-May 2007

Aug 2007-May -2008

Principal-Mr. Prater,

Classroom teachers,

Computer lab teacher-TBA

Teachers salary included in System budget Individual progress report from computer programs
Purchase new computer program for the whole school called Study Island

Purchase SmartBoard

Aug. 2007

Aug. 2007

Principal – Mr. Prater, teachers,

Computer lab teacher

$2,700.00 Program

$1460.00 Board

Progress reports

Increase in academic achievement

Analysis of Math TCAP data is on-going determining individual needs to help students reach mastery or above. Analyze math TCAP data to determine areas of strength and needs based on students’ progress and scores (Value added, (NRT, CRT) July 2006-May 2007,

May 2008-May ‘08

Staff Development

Aug. 9, 2006

Aug. 4, 2007

Principal, Donald Prater,

All K-12 Teachers

Kay Brownyard

Vickie Dodd

Cost is budgeted in staff development building level days, TCAP cost included in the System Budget Teachers planning grade level planning, after school tutoring summer school
Tutoring programs before and after school will be offered to students scoring below proficient levels. Teachers will receive pre and post data to determine the degree of mastery in Math September ’06-

May ‘07

And Sept. ’07-

May ‘08

Donald Prater, Principal

Contract teachers

(TBA)

Classroom teachers

Teachers using extended contract@ about $15 per hour

Grants for LEAPS and ATLAS @ $15 to $18 dollars per hour

Pre and Post Tests-
Classroom and extended teacher reports, report cards, homework completion, parent communication
Alignment of teaching strategies to standards using the curriculum maps to determine that students received the appropriate instruction to increase meeting the standards and proficiency Grade level meetings – Aug. 2006-May 2007

Monthly 2007-08

Donald Prater

Teachers

Support Staff

Bobby Cox

System budget includes teachers and support staff, staff development days built in calendar Teacher checklist of TN State Standards

 

 

Professional Development Plan (Steps or Strategies) to Support Action Plan (as applicable) (Rubric 5.2) Faculty and grade level meetings, required professional development days, (Principal-Donald Prater), (Director of Instruction-Bobby Cox), System-wide curriculum meetings, and workshops to improve test scores and student achievement    
Parent and Community Member Involvement (Steps or Strategies) to Support Action Plan (as applicable) (Rubric 5.2) Teachers will discuss student progress with parents. Invitations for students to participate in tutoring programs will be sent to parents. Newsletters, pamphlets, and other literature will be sent home explaining testing criteria and interpretation. Two Family Nights will be planned, when families can show an interest in each child’s education. Student progress reports will be sent home weekly or at mid-six weeks, reports cards, and K12 Planet (web-site). Stakeholders will be made aware of the progress of the school in striving toward the academic goal through the County’s Newspaper and the School’s Newsletter.    

 

 

Note: Because of the lack of funds, a certified teacher was not hired to direct the computer lab, which mainly uses the research based Orchard Program for Reading/LA and Math. A teacher assistant supervised by the principal directed the computer lab. during the 2006-07 school year. The School anticipates a highly qualified teacher will be hired for the computer lab. for the 2007-08 school year. The teacher assistant will then be assigned to help in the lab. and to give assistance to assigned classroom teachers.

Goal 3 Form 5.1

Increase parental involvement from the 47%, (as shown by our parent survey) to at least 60%, by continuing to give parents opportunities to become involved.

Which Need(s) does this Goal address?

Involving more parents in the education of their children will increase academic achievement and establish a positive moral among students, staff, and community.

How is this Goal linked to the system’s Five-Year Plan?

Long range goal #1: By meeting AYP yearly targets

Long range goal: Warren County School System will collaborate and communicate effectively with parents and the community.

FORM 5.2: Action Steps (Goal 3)   FORM 5.3: Implementation Plan (Goal 3)
GOAL 3: Action Steps (Strategies, Interventions, or Scientific Based Research) (Rubric 5.2)  

 

Timeline

(Rubric 5.3)

Person(s) Responsible (Rubric 5.3) Projected Cost(s)

(Rubric 5.3)

Monitoring Strategy (Rubric 5.3)
Invite parents into school climate.

Letting students and parents know how important education and proficiency rates are to student achieve.

Aug. 2006-

On-going with two new programs for families – one in the fall and one in the spring of ’06-’07

Spring and Fall 07-08

Principal-Donald Prater

All K-5 teachers

School staff

Teachers and staff salaries included in System budget Parents will be invited to the school for special programs, book fairs, parent-teacher conferences, special meetings, to lunch, and as volunteers. Sign-in rosters will be on file to confirm attendance.
Train staff to encourage parental involvement through workshops.

These workshops will train teachers in more effective ways to communicate

 

 

 

 

with parents of all students. Thus, inviting greater participation in the educational achievement levels their child(ren).

July 22, 2006

On-going.

First workshop in July of 2006

 

 

 

 

Communicating with parents workshop – Communication is on-going – updates

Aug. 5, 2007

Principal-Mr. Prater,

Vickie Dodd

TEA Workshop

 

 

 

 

Leader – TEA Rep.

 

 

 

In-service Team

Staff development

TEA Workshop

Free

Teachers and staff will be involved in the training seminar from TEA. monitor

 

 

 

 

attendance and survey to determine

success

Utilize parents’ skills to teach cultural awareness, crafts, and career awareness.

Send an invitation at the beginning of the school year giving parents the opportunity to volunteer their skills in the above areas. Responses will be used by the school counselor and teachers to supply programming for students.

Students can learn from parents and community leaders enhancing there education increasing student achievement levels. An African-American History Awareness Program will be planned as well as a Hispanic Awareness Program.

Aug. 2006 create a form giving parents and opportunity to volunteer their serves in a number of ways to the school.

Feb. 2007 African-American Awareness Program

2007-08 Use the same volunteer forms.

Oct. 2007 – Hispanic Cultural Awareness Program

PTO Officer-Courtney Breedlove

Kay Brownyard

All teachers

Parents’ in kind

Services – Free

 

 

Community participation - Free

A centralized log will be kept in the main office of contributing parents, who lead presentations about different cultures, demonstrate craft ideas, and provide career awareness information.

Discussions and observations of teachers after the Programs.

Promote PTO through communication of meeting dates and times using the school newsletter and school web-site.

The PTO helps purchase needed equipment and materials to assist students in their academic students

Aug. 2006-Continuing PTO Officer Courtney Breedlove

School Secretary-

Charlotte Underhill

Free Sign in rosters -PTO meetings and projects.
Implement two new activities for parent involvement, Family Reading Night and Family Computer Night. Once a semester in Oct. 2006&07 March ’07 & ‘08 Vickie Dodd Free Parent sign-in forms, parent survey results
Purchase new computer program for the whole school called Study Island Aug. 2007 Principal – Mr. Prater, teachers,

Computer lab teacher

$2,700.00 Progress reports

Increase in academic achievement

 

 

Professional Development Plan (Steps or Strategies) to Support Action Plan (as applicable) (Rubric 5.2) Professional development meeting will train teachers to become more aware of the need to keep parents involved and the best practices involved. Principal, teachers, and staff will meet to discuss and plan strategies to promote a "Parent Friendly Environment" in our school. Regular PTO meetings will be scheduled and publicized.
Parent and Community Member Involvement (Steps or Strategies) to Support Action Plan (as applicable) (Rubric 5.2) Parents and teachers will be responsible for working together to promote organized parent involvement programs for our school. Parents will be involved in the PTO, attending school activities, and presenting special programs for student. Parents will be encouraged to participate in parent surveys allowing them to have input in the school program.

Our Partner-in-Education, First National Bank, will be invited to present special programs for students.

 

 

Goal 4 Form 5.1 2007-‘08 Goal - To continue making progress by moving on to Phase II of the Positive Behavior Plan, providing guidance and order to give teachers more time to teach and helping students demonstrate better social skills, thus, helping to achieve higher academic gains.

2006 Goal - Our goal is to establish a school wide positive behavior program in order to obtain gains required academically.

Which Need(s) does this Goal address?

To focus on and improve school wide behavior.

How this is Goal linked to the system’s Five-Year Plan?